SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Suma who wrote (19373)10/26/2004 3:39:31 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
I see that R. D. Buschman gave you a decent explanation.

Had you bothered to read the articles I linked, you would
have never said, "Clinton did in fact balance the
budget".

And yes, if a corporate CEO did what Clinton did, he would
land in jail.

Let's say you were earning $100k a year, but all told, your
expenses were $105K. If you removed all of your living
expenses from your budget, then claimed that you were earning
more than you were spending, you too would have a
Clinton "surplus".

It never existed in reality. You would simply be redefining
the real meaning of the word. Clinton revised the meaning
of "surplus", but never told anyone that significant point.

It's not much different than when you claim "What I present
are the FACTS."

Clinton's "surplus" & your "facts" aren't reality based, but
they are treated as though they are the real McCoy. No wonder
so many folks are confused.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News