I posted from SEVERAL articles.
Correct.
And, as I said, I selected what I believe is the most relevant
excerpt,
not, as you've decided to understand it, the most relevant
article.
Review:
Message 20688841
Got that?
You sure jumped in fast...
That's a rather subjective assessment, wouldn't you say? I was browsing some posts, saw this one, and responded with a cut n' paste. It took a little under four minutes, if SI's timestamps are to be believes and not, perhaps, part of an even greater conspiracy.
What - if anything - are you attempting to insinuate?
...to try and trumpet charges that don't add up...
Where did I 'trumpet,' levy, post, or otherwise offer "charges"?
What "charges" are you saying I've made? Specifically, please.
...and THEN edited your original post. Why is that?
I originally posted the entire text of one of the articles, and then sought to include only the portion that I felt was relevant.
Why do you think I did so?
LPS5 |
