SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208803)10/27/2004 1:45:33 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1575775
 
TP, you're arguing semantics. Creator, God, Gaia, Kahless, whatever.

Why would Jefferson even mention a "Creator" in the first place?


Why would he not mention God? After all, most in the colonies were Christian. Can you not see that "Creator" is about as ecumenical as you can get.....esp. back then?

Think about who created the king of England's "divine right to rule," and why Jefferson needed to refer to a higher authority. True, he was trying to gain support, but does that make his religious convictions any less certain

But he wasn't addressing his own religious convictions. He was Christian and believed in God. When he used the term Creator, he was addressing everyone's God and/or benefactor. Creator, even capitalized, is certainly a generic term for a deity.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext