Amy
This is a weak reply. Either you have evidence of inferior intellect or you don't.
- his divisive language isn't a sign of intelligence because it conveys he is not aware of how followers emulate their leaders (for better or worse). A leader needs to be more careful here. Management 101: role modeling.
Can you point to evidence that this indicates a lack of intellect and not merely a difference of opinion in how certain issues should be handled?
- his inability to factor in new data
Please, can you cite one example you know of where he was unable to do as you say?
- his lack of flexibility conveys a mind that makes decisions based upon loyalty to a position rather than to reason and logic
Can you point to evidence that this indicates a lack of intellect and not merely a difference of opinion in how certain issues should be handled?
- his inability to have an inclusive approach to governing ("I" rather than "we")
Can you point to evidence that this indicates a lack of intellect and not merely a difference of opinion in how certain issues should be handled?
- his lack of insight into various cultures, especially those he attacks (it's better to be informed about your enemy before starting a war). This is a huge one. He's awfully behind the times here. The world has gone global, but he seems stuck behind.
Can you point to evidence that this indicates a lack of intellect and not merely a difference of opinion in how certain issues should be handled?
- his lack of discussing decisions with American people - he tells people what he is going to do, rather than engage in open, interactive dialogue. An intelligent person realizes the best decisions are made with people.
Can you point to evidence that this indicates a lack of intellect and not merely a difference of opinion in how certain issues should be handled?
- his lack of a technology vision. Every president had a vision for technology but Bush. Carter worked on solar energy, Reagan worked on military technology (annoying to us liberals, but at least he understood the importance of technology), and Clinton focused on computers.
Nevermind the BS in your statement, other than, can you please tell me how Clinton "focused on computers"???
Meanwhile, Bush is focusing on bras, socks and textiles. He is protecting industries of the 19th century, rather than having a vision for advancement of the industries for the 21st century.
Bull. This statement is full of crap I don't know where to start.
The reality is that you can't point to even ONE example of anything that indicates a lack of intellect.
Frankly, your post indicates the only lack of intellect here is your's. |
