SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (149274)10/27/2004 2:27:51 PM
From: Michael Watkins  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
I also respect you because you are at least willing to admit that the reasons for invading Iraq are not the pablum being fed to the masses.

If only all the participants in this discussion would elevate their thinking, then a substantive discussion of meaning could take place.

Let me make it clear that I think the reasons for the invasion were never fully articulated because they could not be articulated in public. I think they were sound but that their execution has been very poor.

Execution is poor, but that isn't the issue at all. And this then is the core of the issue: I think the reasons that "could not be articulated in public" are not sound.

Not sound and inherently dangerous.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News