"he was acted on information that is available at the time."
Even if you were to buy this crap, this is incredible generosity, given its consequence. So, in the best case, we have a leader who is about to take the country to war, doesn't have the process and means in place to do due diligence and verify such vital pieces of information. This is the height of ineptness. Why are you not going to hold him responsible for thousands of deaths of our people and innocent people ? Should he not be next to Saddam or Malisovich to prove that how he's not responsible for lost lives ?
"with a 20/20 hindsight it is so much easier, is not it?"
What hindsight ? are you sleeping since before the war, when people are protesting in US and around the world that there are no WMDs and links to Al Queda ? There are some people (these 45% of bush supporters), that dont even have hindsight. Bushies have called these protestor liberals and unpatriotic, because they didn't buy his lies. Wake up, mr. head-in-the-cloud, our leader has duped us big time.
"does that mean you agree that Bush is better for the troops?"
If we are to stay the course, Bush would be better for the troops. But, as i said, we need a new approach and not stay the course. hence no-Bush (among other screwups/lies of the past).
Bum. |
