RE: "This is not the Israel-Palestine thread.
This is not the Bush v. Kerry thread.
This in not the..... "
This is true and I'm frequently way off the topic myself. On the other hand, the topic, by its nature, is one I've always felt was likely to eventually reach a saturation point. The 8000+ posts on this board, in spite of the amount of clutter contained in many of them, probably represents one of the larger collections of 9/11 documentation around. Many of those who have contributed information on the topic, including yourself, would be considered experts on the subject by any real standard of measure. If a person had the time and resources, there's probably enough information on this thread to write a 10 volume set on 9/11. Unfortunately, the message board format doesn't lend itself to easily sorting through that information in an organized fashion on a point by point basis.
My question to you would be, how many times should we rehash the same information that has already been rehashed many times already? It's a serious question, and not intended to be condescending. By the same token, at what point is it appropriate to move forward in identifying places where our system of government has become so corrupted, that events such as 9/11 are likely to occur at any time and any place, whenever a political benefit may be derived from such events, and without any recourse by the people?
So yes, we have the Bush vs. Kerry question. There's Bush, who engineered 9/11 on one side, and Kerry on the other side, who has voted the Bush party line straight across the board at every turn, and unconditionally supports every aspect of the official 9/11 cover up.
And yes, we have the Israel vs. Palestine issue. Israel has usurped control over every aspect of American media and government, and through their participation in 9/11, the most massive false flag operation in the history of the world, has obtained the most perfect blackmail evidence imaginable in order to retain that control for the foreseeable future. On the other side of the issue is a race of people, desperately fighting for their lives, to stop Israel's agenda to wipe them off the face of the earth. That agenda was one of the prime motivations for executing 9/11.
Are these things truly unrelated? Once armed with the facts, is it inappropriate to discuss causes and conditions? Is there a point where remaining on the treadmill of historical research is no longer productive? If so, what is the next step? Would there be any benefit in starting a new thread, with more of a forward looking perspective, but based on the research that has taken place here?
I'm open to suggestions. Personally, I find the occasional off topic discussions to be of interest at times. I certainly find them of more interest than I do the exchange of flames. I admit I've engaged in some of those myself, I just don't find them interesting.
|
