Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (149826)	10/29/2004 3:19:33 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) of 281500

<But those 250 tons were not located under the seal of the International Atomic Energy Agency — as the missing high-grade explosives had been — and Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita could not definitely say whether they were part of the missing 377 tons.> They must have found a lot of cattle in Iraq, because there is an endless supply of bullshit -- the "finding" of those weapons piles it on thick. First the weapons were not there when we arrived. Then the weapons might have been but the military was on orders to just move on and ignore them. Then we remembered that they were never there at all. Then we remembered that it was because we destroyed "them" -- although, ah, come to think of it, there is nothing to say that we know that is true. More bullshit, on top of the old bullshit, piled on top of all the other bullshit. The explosive were secured by the UN -- we "destroyed them" although the military says it does not know what it destroyed and the destruction that took place was not of materials under UN seal and was not documented -- now cannot account for them at all. Incredible bullshit.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next