SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.94+0.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (138169)10/29/2004 8:07:53 PM
From: TimFRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
If you have $2500 per fully processed wafer and 612 gross die per wafer that would give you a manufacturing cost of a little over $4 per gross die. But doesn't gross die include all die including those that don't work or that bin too low? To know the cost per net die you would have to know the yield (counting thoe that bin too low as not yielding a good die). Then you would have to take those good die and package them. I think that would cost more then making them.

I forgot to add test costs, and there is also shipping/ distributiion (pretty low I think but I don't know how much), marketing and general overhead (marketing, R&D, management and administration, fab construction costs ect.)

Maybe it only is $4 manufacturing cost per gross die produced (and maybe $4.50 to $7 per net, but I really don't know Intel's yields so this is just a guess) but I think manufacturing cost per net die is only a fraction of the total cost (including overhead)

Edit -
Message 20704670

Maybe $15 is reasonable for variable costs (might even be less at least for the smallest dies) but there is the fixed costs of the fab and their are other overhead costs. I have no way of estimating them but I doubt they would be negliable.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext