Kerry's October surprise
Friday, October 29, 2004
How's this for an October surprise?
While John Kerry is running around claiming President George Bush and
our troops overseas failed the American people by not guarding an
explosives dump without explosives in it, documents have been uncovered
at Texas Tech University that show Kerry was following Vietnam War
protest guidelines from North Vietnamese communists in the early 1970s.
"Wait! Why am I not seeing any of this in the national news media, Mr.
Gaylon?" you might be asking. "This cannot be true. Our Democrat
candidate for president surely wasn't on the side of the communists and
carrying out their requests when he got home from valiantly fighting for
his country and winning all those medals, was he?"
Yes, he was.
The documents -- which actually LOOK like they came from the 1970s and
not from a Microsoft Word program -- were found at the Vietnam Center at
Texas Tech University in Lubbock and reproduced from captured communist
records. These documents have been PROVEN 100 percent authentic BEFORE
their release, unlike those 60 Minutes National Guard documents that CBS
refuses to investigate. They show that Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Viet
Cong provisional governor of South Vietnam at the Paris Peace Talks,
delivered a plan from Le Duc Tho -- Ho Chi Minh's second in command --
for American anti-war activities that anti-war protesters followed to
the letter.
These documents are available at www.worldnetdaily.com or
www.wintersoldier.com and show anti-war protesters not only received
approval from the communists in North Vietnam, but also their direction.
One of the documents states, "The spontaneous antiwar movements in the
U.S. have received assistance and guidance from the friendly (i.e.
communist Vietnamese) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks."
Another article at www.nysun.com/article/3756 also reflects on the
North Vietnamese anti-war coordination with protest groups.
By the way, Madame Binh subsequently became the Minister of Information
for the People's Republic of Vietnam after Saigon fell. You know what
"Minister of Information" means in communist countries, right?
Of these organizations, the Vietnam Veterans Against the War and the
communist organizations Peoples Committee for Peace and Justice and
National Peace Action Committee were represented at the talks. Some
representatives of these groups had their airfare covered by the United
States Communist Party.
Shortly after Kerry returned from the talks he delivered Madame Binh's
peace proposal through a press conference on July 22, 1971. He did so
with veterans' families around him, a tactic that was suggested by the
communists. However, he said he only attended the peace talks because he
was on his honeymoon in Paris.
There are two problems, Hanoi John met twice, and possibly thrice, with
communist officials in Paris. Also, his honeymoon was spent at the
Jamaica home of the Pershing family with then (other) heiress wife,
Julia Thorne, in 1970. I suppose Paris was a second honeymoon.
Kerry had also met illegally with Binh in 1970 while he was still a
Naval officer on inactive reserve status, and in fact, all his meetings
were under the six-year window of the term of his enlistment. This
precludes him from even running for elective office, much less
president, but nobody is mentioning it for some reason. Amendment 14,
Section 3 states: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in
Congress, or elector of President and Vice-president, having previously
taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, [who
has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid
or comfort to the enemies thereof."
Other documents show the Hanoi plan for war protests, which was
basically accepted and carried out by PCPJ, NPAC and VVAW and other
protest groups, which eventually forced a vastly superior military force
to capitulate to a sniveling gang of thugs because of propaganda and
lies.
It was John Kerry's finest hour.
So Kerry's earnest presidential campaign begins and ends the same place
it started: Vietnam. And the whole way, the national liberal news media
have ignored his crimes. They are overlooking this new evidence while
inflating a bogus charge from the United Nations against the president
during a time of war. Kerry is helping spread the lie, again, working
against his government for his own purposes.
Those who think this man is even an American -- much less are willing to
vote for him -- ought to have their heads examined. But then again, so
few people on the left even know what it means to BE American anymore
that I doubt Kerry's activities alarm, surprise or offend them. There is
a growing body in the Democrat Party that sees nothing wrong with
subservience to the United Nations on any and all issues. For them,
Kerry must be a revelation.
But for Americans who do not trust an organization so guilty of greed,
glorification of communism, thuggery, deception, virulent anti-Semitism
and corruption, Kerry is anathema. His pursuit of the presidency should
never have been allowed, but for all the left-wing propagandists in the
media. They've refused to do their jobs and we're paying the price with
a lousy, traitorous Democrat candidate.
John Kerry took the direction of a foreign government in protesting one
war and now he's doing it again. This time, as with the last, he is a
willing puppet of people opposed to American strength.
John Kerry is on the wrong side again, folks. I hope on Nov. 2 you're on
the right one.
Gaylon Parker can be reached at gparker@themississippipress.com or (228)
875-8144.
gulflive.com |
