SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (209574)10/31/2004 10:10:32 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 1575057
 
So now it is 219 tonnes, not the 377 originally claimed by partisan liberals.

This is from the IAEA site:
'Of note was that the sealing ton bunkers was only partially effective because each bunker had ventilation shafts on the sides of the buildings. These shafts were not sealed and could provide removal routes for the H.M.X. while leaving the front door locked.'

Pentegon spokesman Bret Baier concluded: "So even though IAEA inspectors returned in March of '03, they only checked some of the seals and cannot definitively say that all or any of the explosives were inside those bunkers."

The best evidence to support your thesis involves several jumps of conjecture.

Once again, you claim that the only plausible explanation is the one that you believe will further your political objectives. The FMSM agrees with you. They are marginalizing themselves.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News