Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (82367)	11/1/2004 6:03:36 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) of 793817

"Credible", "more likely than not" . . . . in law, these are arguments you use in a civil case, these are arguments for lawyers to parse and juries to debate. In politics, if you don't have the documents, a photograph or a credible live eyewitness, give it up. I am not saying your information is wrong. I am just saying that logic and inference are not enough to convict someone beyond a reasonable doubt in the court of public opinion. May I remind you that Watergate breaking did not keep Nixon from being re-elected, even though the coverup ruined him?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next