SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (24222)11/1/2004 11:25:36 PM
From: Karin  Read Replies (1) of 27181
 
A vote for John Kerry is a vote AGAINST the U.S. military
personnel who liberated Iraq -- those Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen
and Marines -- who are now on the frontline defending our
critical national interests in the region against Jihadi
terrorists. It is also a vote against those who have already
provided the last measure on that front in service to our great
nation.

Indeed, there is a direct correlation between Kerry's efforts to
politicize dissent against U.S. resolve in the war against
terrorism -- specifically on the Iraqi warfront -- and American
and Allied causalities on that front. Those forces, including
countless Iraqis, are being injured and killed in ever-
increasing numbers because of the political discord Kerry and
his ilk are fomenting.

If you think there is not a connection between Kerry's campaign
rhetoric and U.S. casualties, read on....

Kerry has reduced the war to liberate Iraq to nothing more than
political fodder, which has emboldened our Jihadi enemies. As
noted recently by Professor Mohammad Amin Bashar at Baghdad's
Islamic University, "If the U.S. Army suffered numerous
humiliating losses, Kerry would emerge as the superman of the
American people." To that end, Abu Jalal, an influential Iraqi
resistance leader, said last month, "American elections and
Iraq are linked tightly together. We've got to work to change
the election, and we've done so. With our strikes, we've
dragged Bush into the mud."

The net effect of Kerry's dissention can certainly be felt in
terms of increased numbers of American and Allied casualties. A
few weeks ago, John Edwards unwittingly provided the evidence
for this very correlation: "We lost more troops in September
than we lost in August; lost more in August than we lost in
July; lost more in July than we lost in June."

This was, and remains, the unavoidable consequence of Kerry's
reckless campaign rhetoric. The blood of those American
Patriots (like the blood of his "brothers" in Vietnam, after he
used that war as fodder for his 1972 congressional campaign),
is on John Kerry's hands.

To be sure, this is the harshest of all condemnations. But it
is also the truth.

Now, Osama bin Laden, who planned the 9/11 attack killing 3,000
of our countrymen -- men, women and children -- has emerged
from his rat hole, and issued a statement which is,
unquestionably, timed to support John Kerry.

In that light, the most challenging question that can be asked on
this, the eve of the 2004 Presidential Election, is not so
much, "For whom will you vote?" but "With whom will you vote?"

Will you vote with Osama bin Laden, Abu Jalal, Saddam Hussein
and Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi? How about Kim Jong-Il, Mohammad
Khatami, Moammar al-Ghadafi and Hu Jingtao. All of these
tyrants support John Kerry.

or...

Will you vote with America's fighting forces, who, according to a
just- published Army Times poll, overwhelmingly support President
George W. Bush. In fact, 82 percent of our Armed Forces said
they do not want John Kerry as their Commander in Chief.

On Tuesday, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS -- VOTE FOR GEORGE W. BUSH!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext