SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (150440)11/2/2004 1:08:17 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I see you're one of the 72% of Americans who have bought the fiction that Saddam was behind 9/11 rather than his antagonist, Osama bin Laden. Saddam had called for the overthrow of Osama! And you believe that Iraq was a greater threat to America than were, and are, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia. And thus this occupation is well worth the deaths of thousands and thousands of human beings and billions and billions of dollars and the establishment of a terrorist-recruitment spectacle in Iraq that Bin Laden Public Relations Inc would be proud of designing. Not one of the 9/11 terrorists was an Iraqi. Eleven or twelve of the fourteen were Saudis. Bush Junior was talking about invading Iraq two years before 9/11! He thought he was smarter than his father. He isn't. I believe you know it's a disaster and because you like some of Bush's policies, feel it incumbent on you to defend this example of utter incompetence.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News