SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cnyndwllr who wrote (22107)11/3/2004 12:40:03 PM
From: bull_derrick  Read Replies (1) of 23153
 
The concept of separation of church and state is not a constitutional right. In fact, it's not to be found in the Constitution anywhere. An activist court resorted to a letter written by Jefferson to a Baptist church in Danbury Ct to contrive a constitutional basis. In that letter, Jefferson assured the Baptists that there would be no state appointed denomination, like the Lutheran church is in Germany or the Anglican church in England. This contrived "right" has been used to remove ten commandments from courthouses and modify government seals to deny basic heritage from our country, as if it never existed in the first place. Atheism through litigation was never the basis of the letter to the Danbury Baptists and it shows the danger of activism from the judiciary.

I'm quite happy to see a court that goes back to interpreting law, rather than making it. My hope is that we get more judges that do just that. If people have problems with their "rights" under that scenario, they can contact their elected officials to change the laws to embrace those rights that they'd want protected. Because the legislature and the executive branch are accountable to the people through elections, this is where rights should properly be established
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext