Very good info. I was thinking the same thing last night. Note that the two states the link you posted are both run by demos. Iowa was going Bush's way with like 97%, and all of the sudden they were too tired to keep counting. And Richardson was saying that New Mexico would go for Kerry, and when it was not he decided to stop counting until the Ohio theft could be analyzed. And the dems had the balls to say the repubs would do this. Despicable and transparent. I knew info like this (cut and pasted below) would come out.
Media still won't call Iowa or New Mexico for Bush, but...
11/03/2004 | Fatalis
Posted on 11/03/2004 10:31:24 AM PST by Fatalis
Take CNN (please!):
Iowa
Bush (Incumbent): 743,621 50%
Kerry: 730,067 49%
That's about 13,000 votes of 774,000, for a 1.7% margin for Bush.
New Mexico:
Bush(Incumbent) 363,369 50%
Kerry: 351,070 49%
That's about 12,000 votes out of 714,000, for a 1.6% margin for Bush.
But...
New Hampshire
Kerry: 340,019 50%
Bush(Incumbent): 330,848 49%
That's a 9,000 vote margin of about 671,000 votes between them, for a 1.3% margin for Kerry.
Wisconsin
Kerry:1,490,101 50%
Bush (Incumbent): 1,477,405 49%
That's about 13,000 votes out of almost 3 million, or a 0.4% margin for Kerry.
So President Bush has bigger margins in Iowa in New Mexico than Kerry has in Wisconsin and New Hampshire, yet Kerry gets the calls while he stalls on nis concession speech. |
