SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President George W. Bush - a lame duck President

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFileNext 10PreviousNext  
From: Lazarus_Long11/3/2004 6:52:52 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 128
 
What are you complaining about? You assured us just a few days ago that Kerry would win. Were you wrong?

This was the previous thread header of your "John Kerry For President" thread.

================================================================
Message Boards | Politics/Government: President John F. Kerry

Posts: 0 | Member Bookmarks: 2 | No Bans

Add SubjectMark | Hide Original Post
Started By: ChinuSFO
Date: 10/27/2004 4:53:06 PM

With the elections less than a week away, it is a foregone conclusion that John Kerry will beat Bush on Nov. 2. But we cannot afford to rest on that, since there will be efforts to subvert the democratic process on and after election day.

This thread is a start to discuss how we can fend off the onslaught to our democratic system and to ensure that Kerry gets into the White House, in keeping with the wishes of the American people. This thread stands by along with the Kerry lawyers to do so on and after Nov. 2nd.
===============================================================

OTOH, you do have a long history of banning for telling the truth when you didn't like it.

Message 20548693
Message 20548902

You yourself admit you are a liar. You seem to consider it a virtue.
Message 20520045

This is a real jewel considering your own behavior:
Message 20446197

You violated the TOU:
Message 20487601
Message 20485010

First you say you will ban for discussing a legitimate subject, then you go to Ann Corrigan's thread to do just that:
siliconinvestor.com

THEN you say it's OK to discuss the subject, but ONLY if you take a negative view of it:
Message 20444555

You are Arab- -or so you say:
Message 20405289
Message 20406170

Now ordinarily, this is "So what?". Except, of course, you were pushing with everything you've got a Presidential candidate who you hoped would pull American troops out of the Middle East. leaving a power vacuum your brothers could exploit. Let's the words "vested interest" come to mind.

You scream about prisoner abuse and yet at the same time scream about it.
Message 20394972

I had the brazen audacity to point out the unscrupulous nature of your thread management. Frankly, it is the worst moderated thread I have ever seen on SI. This is what you PMed me:
Your posts on the Kerry thread has been very offensive to many patrons of the thread. They Pm'd me, I also had to agree with them. So while others who have been unbanned on the thread have not drawn any sentiment of the nature that you have, I have put you back on the ban list.

It is OK with me if you want to make this PM public. The choice is yours.


At the very time you supposedly were death on namecalling, you tolerated many, many instances of such as this:
Message 20392262
Message 19787557

This, in the light of all the above, is particularly interesting:
Message 20391284

Someone else took up the battle flag for me:
Message 19786350

Go ahead. Ban me. Every time you do you, you prove my point. BTW, you are not banned from my thread, so if you care to come over to settle anything, feel free.

Be prepared to point out the name calling and ridicule in the above. It appears to me to be simply a statement of historical fact.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFileNext 10PreviousNext