SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jagfan who wrote (24671)11/3/2004 10:32:32 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) of 27181
 
Media bias:PA Will Probably Total Bush 50% vs Kerry 50% When Absentee Ballots are Counted

Bias Beyond the Pale:
Are you aware that the Pennsylvania race was closer (Kerry gets 51.08%) than the Ohio race (Bush gets 51.2%) or Nevada race (Bush gets 51.4%)? Think about this fact. Did the networks have any problem calling Pennsylvania for Kerry? None whatsoever. I believe one network had Pennsylvania in the Kerry column within an hour of the polls closing. And when one considers that absentee ballots always break in the direction of conservatives, the Pennsylvania race will further tighten while the Ohio race widens.

Are you aware that New Hampshire has 99% of the vote in with 50.7245% for Kerry to 49.2755% for Bush and has been called for Kerry?
Are you aware that Wisconsin has 99% of the vote in with 50.2255% for Kerry to 49.7745% for Bush and has been called for Kerry?
Absentee ballots would only make these races tighter.

Are you aware that Iowa has 99% of the vote in with 50.5325% for Bush to 49.4675% for Kerry and has NOT been called for Bush?
Are you aware that New Mexico has 99% of the vote in with 50.8816% for Bush to 49.1184% for Kerry and has NOT been called for Bush?
Are you aware that Nevada has 99% of the vote in with 51.3536% for Bush to 48.6464% for Kerry and has NOT been called for Bush (except for one network)?
Absentee ballots would only make these races wider.

I could write a commentary here, but why bother?

Comments:

1) I noticed the same thing. The gap in Ohio is wider in favor of Bush than the gap in Pennsylvania is in favor of Kerry. But they had no problem calling Pennsylvania for Kerry while every ballot only makes that one closer. They are holding off on Ohio, but that gap will only get wider.

Maybe they just don’t want to call a winner. That way more people watch for longer. Or they are just holding out hope for Kerry; or both.

politicaltracker.com

2)November 3, 2004
This is an incredible, damning set of stats. It clearly, succinctly and finally drives the stake of truth through the media's cold, manipulative heart.

3)November 3, 2004

But what can we do about it?.....I live and vote in PA and the radio stations this morning were all over this story………….nothing will happen!!!

(But I think something is happening. The takedown of CBS by the blogosphere was a telling sign that the mainstream media is vulnerable and this debacle will make them more vulnerable, and people like you, who used to be bystanders, are now watchdogs. I bet Pennsylvania finishes at 50-50 with a very slight edge for Kerry by the time absentees are counted.

Consider the media dividend that we now realize (read Fear of Extinction) and be hopeful!}

4) November 3, 2004

I stayed up until 2 AM Mountain Time thinking that at least one of the gutless networks would call the election for Bush. Instead, they all got in a holding pattern and refused to call any state that would put up 270 or more for Bush. It was the worst at CNN & CBS. Both FOX and MSNBC rightly called OH for Bush.
I have come to expect this from the left of center media. Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Michigan go in the Kerry column and Ohio is too close to call. Now we have the 'unifier' refusing to allow the 'polarizing' President an opportunity to pull the country together a little bit.

5)November 3, 2004
Time for conservatives to band together to buy newspaper chains or form new ones -- ditto TV networks. Maybe the blogosphere can call for donations to a fund to do so. Maybe the Swifties can organize this.

6) November 3, 2004
It’s worse than bias in the calls, there’s bias in the exit polls. ALL the exit polls were biased, and anyone with half a brain, and access to the exit poll detail info, could see it. I don’t have the specifics, only anecdote. The specifics we do have are that the networks were unable to call big Bush states (such as VA and SC, even MS) early because of exit poll data. The problem is that the exit poll data surely affects voters willingness to vote. The bias was so strong that at the Iowa Electronics Markets, Bush was given ~15% probability of winning in the early evening (~5pm PST).

{ I am in the dark here. I knew the exit polling was going bad and blocked it all out early, confident in looking at the county-by-county returns in Florida and Pennsylvania (where Philadelphia and Allegheny accounted for 90% of the early returns) that these polls were wrong.}

7) November 3, 2004

While the pundits will now focus on what Republicans and Democrats did right/wrong, we Americans had better make sure that the veracity and truthfulness of the press and major media is thoroughly vetted. It is an open secret that major media bias the news to either favor the Democrat/Liberal or denigrate the Republican/Conservative. If it were not for Fox News’ alternate view over the past few years, I believe that the election results last night could have been much different. We need to find a way to get the spotlight to shine back on the media. Please keep raising this critical issue!>>>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext