Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: beach_bum who wrote (210859)	11/6/2004 10:03:43 AM
From: brian1501	Read Replies (2) of 1571926

Are you just defending the word "marriage" here ? If we pick another word called "xyz" and give exactly same priviledges like tax break, insurance coverage to "xyz" as "marriage", is that alright with you ? What specifically are the gays/lesbians destroying, that is not already broken in a marriage with 50% divorce rate ? It's more than a word. Marriage for all of us "reds" is something provided by God for a man and a woman. Most couple's vows include God as a central theme. They are pledging themselves to each other before GOD. Two gay guys can shack up, and I'm fine with giving them the same benefits (if you must), but they can never be married. It's not possible, and it would further erode the institution. BTW, there is a big difference between "supporting partial-birth abortion" and "choice of partial-birth abortion". Agreed, but you have to draw the line somewhere. If the baby is that far along, just have it and put it up for adoption. The practice is barbaric, and getting rid of it in no way effects a woman's "right" to choose, just the timing of her choice. Brian

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next