Paracelsian Inc (PRLN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Paracelsian Inc (PRLN)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Harold Stone who wrote (3186)	8/28/1997 7:21:00 PM
From: John H. Farro	of 4342

Harold, you make some very good points in your post. Actually, we are not that far apart in our thinking. You said: If he had said something voluntarily at the conference that he sold stock it would have perhaps diverted attention from the presentation and might also be construed as an attempt to push the price of the stock down. It seems like you have elaborated a point I made in post 3171: It would have been nice if Babish had issued a press release stating just what was going on, but what do you bet that if he had issued such a release the company would now be suing him for damaging them by disclosing private information and portraying them in a bad light? Seems to me that he would have been damned if he issued a release and damned if he didn't.<i/> I still wish he hadn't sold his stock, but once he started to sell he would have been second guessed no matter what he did as far as telling the rest of the world. I'm sure that if he had told the conference about his sale, then Rhodes would have made a big deal of this in his lawsuit against Babish. Robin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next