Your name calling, personal attacks & anecdotal evidence of
isolated changes prove nothing about the Kyoto treaty, which
is where I made my original point. It also proves absolutely
nothing to the false assertion that global warming is due to
Bush's so called "failed global warming policies".
As I have asked, why is the air & water cleaner now than when
Bush took office?
While you are at it, answer these simple questions:
What caused the ice ages & global warming before humans existed?
How many species became extinct before man walked the earth?
How many species became extinct before man became a dominant species on earth?
How many species became extinct before 1750 AD?
After humans populated earth, why did the earth experience
mini ice ages & warming periods centuries before
industrialization?
Why did our top scientists predict a looming ice age in the
1970's due to the pollutants belched out globally every year?
Why is the same pollution from the 1970's now have our top
scientists calling for massive global warming?
Who was more wrong, scientists of the 1970's or those of
today?
Why are there no models that can accurately recreate past
global weather even though known data can be inputted?
Why are we then using models to predict future global weather
patterns when we know with absolute certainty that these
models are severely flawed?
Please give me specific answers to each question & the
irrefutable data that supports your answers.
There is lots of speculation that is being called science,
but there is no pure science that proves;
- global warming will continue unabated into the future,
- global warming is due to "Bush's failed policies",
- global warming is due to pollutants created by man,
- global warming will be halted by strict adherence to the Kyoto treaty, or
- global warming (or an ice age) won't occur on its own even if we completely stop polluting. |
