Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: lucky_girl	11/10/2004 9:30:29 AM
	Read Replies (2) of 122087

Hedgefundman you said: disclsoure and truth being more effective in a market place than regulation and law. I wish that truth were more effective in a market place; past history has proven to me at least that regulation and law will be the status quo for the US market. As for Tony Elgindy and this trial, well, this is NOT a trial for terrorism therefore the comment that Ken Breen made in trial concerning Elgindy’s involvement in 9/11 is NOT relevant to this particular RICO trial. The judge was right to deny the admission of any statements or proof of Elgindy’s involvement in 9/11 into this particular trial’s records. Ken Breen’s full title is much more than ‘Assistant U.S. Attorney.’ *Ken Breen IS coordinator of the stock market unit of a government task force set up to investigate financing for terrorist groups.* THAT IS WHY Breen is the lead prosecutor against Elgindy AND that is WHY he is so gun-ho to hang a terrorism label on him at this place in time. Accusations of terrorism directed toward Tony Elgindy and his family’s involvement in 9/11, if any beyond the knowledge that such an attack was coming, will be the subject of a future trial, if there is a future trial in this area. Remember that Tony has another very important trial already lined up where he will be sued along with quite a few other people. If he survives this trial he will be quite a busy person for some time to come. There is so much here that involves the use of computers in this particular stock case; the use of computers and specialized program(s) spills over into the effort to gain wealth from the U.S. market to use to finance 9/11 and to finance other terrorist activities. This is WHY Ken Breen brought up that particular accusation at this point in time. It was a preview of future events. The jury DID HEAR the allegation that Tony knew about 9/11 and that armed with this knowledge that such a terrible event was about to commence, he did nothing beyond trying to enhance his own pocket book. Please remember that Tony had two (2) million dollar$$$ in the market in a position where a fall in the market would benefit him a great deal. (Actually, 2 million $$$ was a very small sum compared to what other terrorists had invested in our market.) The trial for terrorism is a future event; there is a great deal of evidence that still needs to be gathered, recorded and set up in an orderly and understandable scenario so ‘ordinary folk’ can understand it well enough to convict. You see when a case comes to trial; it is important to present evidence in such a way to convince a jury that the defendant is guilty. The defendant can be as guilty as SIN and still get off from the charges because the jury was not convinced that the defendant was guilty. It is up to the prosecutor(s) to present the evidence in a trial in a convincing manner to the jury and or judge to PROVE guilt. Dave, thank you for the information you posted the other day. .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next