Moderate Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonder who wrote (13605)	11/10/2004 10:30:30 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) of 20773

"Wstera here is trying to wiggle away from answering my reply to him by pointing me towards a million questions which he originally asked someone else." First, those questions quite appropriately apply to your responses to me. Second, I'll repeat my original response to you. Your response proved absolutely nothing that is going to change my mind, let alone prove that real science proves anything about global warming or the Kyoto Treaty. So why should I bother answering your non-response to me?........ FWIW, I'm not interested in more junk science. There exists no model that can recreate our past global weather & temps, where known data actually exists. None! ZERO! How do you expect me to buy into a theoretical model that is proven to be flawed? One that will have input into it purely speculative data about future trends for thousands, if not millions of data points. Show me a model that can perfectly recreate past known weather & temps on a global scale using known data. When that happens I'll listen to their purely speculative theories about the future, but I will still be skeptical. Until then it is junk science fostered by people more interested in environmentalism than pure science. Ö¿Ö dev.siliconinvestor.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next