SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (85479)11/11/2004 4:10:07 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793838
 
POWERLINE - The Federalists are coming

The Federalist Society is holding its annual National Lawyers Convention in Washington, D.C. starting tomorrow. Unfortunately, a combination of business travel and family commitments will keep me from attending. Here is the awesome schedule of events. Justice Scalia will deliver the Barbara Olson memorial lecture on Friday night.

The Federalist Society became a bete noir of liberals around the time that Ken Starr was investigating Bill Clinton. There's no denying that its members frequently conspire to be conservatives. Ironically, though, the organization also puts together some of the best, most ideologically balanced discussion panels you can find. Check out the schedule link in the preceding paragraph if you don't believe me.

Liberals sometimes complain that the Federalist Society has too much influence in the judge selection process when Republicans are in power. I would state it differently -- the organization enhances the ability of a president to select conservative judges to the extent that the president wishes to do so. Republican presidents are notorious for not picking conservative Supreme Court Justices -- think of Justice Souter, Justice Stevens, and Justice Blackmun. This can happen because the president would rather pick a non-conservative or because he wants to pick a friend (or a friend of a friend) and doesn't care about ideology. But it seems that, in some cases, presidents have intended to pick a conservative and simply failed to do so. The existence of the Federalist Society in its present mature and robust form makes it easier, I believe, for a president's staff to identify conservatives who really are conservative.

Posted by deacon at 10:29 PM | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Coleman Is On the Case

After less than two years in the Senate, Minnesota's Norm Coleman is rapidly becoming one of the most influential members of that body, on account of his extraordinary talent and his equally extraordinary capacity for hard work. Among other things, he is the Chairman of the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Norm is putting that position to good use by investigating the U.N.'s Food for Oil program, under which the U.N. collaborated with Saddam Hussein's regime in a massive fraud that enriched Saddam, U.N. officials and their relatives, and innumerable politicians and journalists worldwide. Check out this press release:

The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) has scheduled a hearing entitled, “How Saddam Hussein Abused the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program.” The hearing is set for Monday, November 15, 2004, at 12:00 p.m. in Room 342 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. This hearing will be the first of several hearings the Subcommittee intends to hold on this matter.
Today, Chairman Coleman and ranking member Senator Carl Levin also sent a letter to Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, reiterating a request for access to UN internal audit reports as well as key personnel knowledgeable about the abuses of the UN OFF program. The Subcommittee also objected to the recent actions of the Independent Inquiry Committee (“IIC”) headed by Paul Volker, that are “affirmatively preventing the Subcommittee” from receiving key documents relevant to its investigation.

The Subcommittee’s first hearing on the Oil-for-Food Program (“OFF Program”) will lay the foundation for future hearings on how the OFF Program was exploited by Saddam Hussein. The Subcommittee is scheduled to hear from Charles A. Duelfer, author of “The Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD.” Mr. Duelfer will testify as to how Saddam Hussein manipulated the OFF Program to erode United Nations sanctions, generated billions of dollars of illicit funds, and procured conventional weapons.

Also scheduled to testify is Juan Carlos Zarate, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Executive Office for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes at the Department of the Treasury. Mr. Zarate will discuss the extent to which funds illicitly procured under the OFF Program may have been used by Saddam Hussein for illicit purposes, including whether monies pilfered from the OFF Program are being used to fund the Iraqi insurgency or terrorist groups. The Subcommittee will also examine specific transactions in which the former Iraqi regime procured illicit funds and peddled influence by granting vouchers for oil deals, demanding kickbacks on contracts for humanitarian goods, and exacting surcharges on oil sales.

This is potentially great news. We're all used to seeing inept, windbag Senators attempting to question witnesses, while mostly delivering incoherent speeches. Not so with Norm, who, among his other talents, was a first-rate trial lawyer in the Minnesota Attorney General's office before he began his political career. If there is anyone who can shed some light on the U.N. scandal, it's Norm Coleman. Stay tuned.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext