Moderate Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sully- who wrote (13633)	11/11/2004 5:16:01 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) of 20773

I can't help it that thousands of legitimate experts completely disagree with you. Really. From your own link (the first one - can't be bothered to sift through them all): ----------------------------------------------------- According to SEPP associate Candace Crandall, these petititions show that "the number of scientists refuting global warming is growing."[4] (http://www.sepp.org/glwarm/ccwtltr.html) However, people who have examinated the petitions challenge that conclusion, pointing out that: 1. The 1992 "Statement by Atmospheric Scientists" is more than a decade old and only has 46 signers. 2. The Heidelberg Appeal actually does not say anything about global warming. 3. Most of the signers of the Leipzig Declarations are non-scientists or lack credentials in the specific field of climate research. 4. Many of the signers of the Oregon Petition are also non-scientists or lack relevant scientific backgrounds. ---------------------------------------------------------- And what on earth is this referring to a site called "WorldIQ" anyway? Don't you know of any scientific sites?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next