Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (151343)	11/11/2004 4:08:12 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 281500

The war in Iraq is in fact illegal for one simple and basic reason: The UN declares it as such. That doesn't make it illegal for one simple and basic reason: the UN is not a legal authority over the US. - There was no resolution suspending the ceasefire of 1990. - The UN did not approve of the US taking unilateral, and illegal, action to deliver the "serious consequences" threatened by 1441. These and the other points are irrelevant to the question because the UN is not sovereign over the world but I'll answer these two anyway. No resolution was need suspending the ceasefire. Its a ceasefire agreement. If the agreement is violated then there is no more requirement to cease fire. The UN approved of the serious consequences in resolution 1441. There is no inherent need for an additional resolution to actually impose the serious consequences. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next