SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: steve harris who wrote (660558)11/15/2004 5:37:24 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (3) of 769670
 
It is a difficult topic to even discuss given the amount of code speaking rhetoric on both sides.

I agree that no human being is able to determine when or the precise mechanism for ensoulment. The time line issue is the key to the problem in the court system.

So, in a non-political discussion people might be willing to come to a consensus that it occurs 'sometime' and most likely around or after the first trimester. However, in a political and legal battle we fight at the extreme poles. The unbelievers argue the provability of a soul at all. The believers argue that any living flesh with complete DNA qualifies. So, the timeline starts at zero plus a moment.

The pro-abortionists argue that rape and incest justify the law, even though these are the rare exceptions to your 1.5 million a year statistics. Anti-abortionists argue that life itself is sacred. Sacred in what context? and qualified by what measure? If God had intended this issue to be black and white he wouldn't have created a gray area for discussion. I suspect our souls are being tested within this arena.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext