SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: manny_velasco who wrote (87946)11/15/2004 10:11:22 PM
From: tralfasador  Read Replies (2) of 122087
 
The $6 Million dollar story is a false story. However it was very effective for what its likely intent was, by whomever the originator of the allegation was.

The FBI gets told there is a $6 Million dollar exchange. Of course it must be checked out. The story does not pan out. Obviously IF it was in fact true, IT WOULD be part of this case going on now. But its not. It was a claim that was checked out, and it is simply false. Bad lead, happens all the time.

However, upon examining this claim and others, the FBI was clued into what other things were going on. And as it turned out, going on with two of the FBI's own.

The end result is what is claimed in the indictment. There is not a fantastic conspiracy beyond those charges. You could not hold back our guys if there was something else that could have been charged.

The attempted liquidation of accounts prior to 9-11, is most likely one of those coincidence occurrences. Mr. Elgindy was a trader, the market in 2001 was not a strong market prior to September. Actions don't always have deep meaning.

If you want to examine the reality of what is going on, read the indictment and the superseding indictment. It not that complicated.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext