SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ild who wrote (21879)11/16/2004 12:02:41 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (1) of 110194
 
Date: Tue Nov 16 2004 11:46
trotsky (skinny) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
i see you're very worried, deep down, that Barrick might go broke ( you assert that they 'won't go broke' almost every day, so you must harbor some fear with regards to the possibility ) .
naturally you wonder 'how could they possibly go broke'? i can provide an answer.
there are two sides to a rising gold price from a miners PoV. on the one hand, the higher price boosts revenues. on the other, it stands to reason that production costs will also rise ( for instance, from '68 to '80, the oz. gold rose from $35 to $850, but the cost of producing it went from $20 to $280, on average ) .
now let's assume gold goes to $1,000 as you predict ( btw., i didn't know you were so bullish. change of heart? ) . miner A sees his production costs go from $260/oz. to $600/oz. - this leaves a healthy margin of $400/oz., so the rise in costs would not be seen as a very worrisome development.
miner B however, has sold forward 10 million oz. at $350 - and now must produce gold at $600, for a negative margin of $250/oz.
and that is how Barrick, in theory, could go broke ( i say in theory because i'd expect the bankers to force them into buying back the hedge book long before that happens ) .
it is not the rising gold price per se that is the danger - it is the associated rise in production costs. so your worries are well founded.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext