Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (151765)	11/16/2004 3:46:40 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) of 281500

"Would it be correct to attibute this belief to bin laden? to the mullahs in iran? to the wahabis in SA? Is this a more sunni or shiaa radical view?" My first guess is that they would find ways to declare everyone an enemy as they did with the World Trade Center bombings. However, even from the Radical perspective: It would be fair to say that anyone who 'opposes' them in establishing thier World Wide Khaliphate must be killed. They would agree to allow those who are willing to be subordinated by Islamic rule to live and be tolerated to practice their own religions as long as they made the same financial contributions that would be required of their Muslim followers. Only the Monotheistic religions would be recognized/tolerated though (sorry Sun Tzu, sorry trinity folk). My personal view: All worldly religious authority is corrupted by political and personal lust for realestate, power, and social dominance. However, that is not to say that the message to believers from God is corrupt ...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next