SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (20329)11/17/2004 5:23:57 AM
From: The Vet  Read Replies (1) of 313062
 
Actually EPM.U economics are much the same as GRZ's but it has only a quarter the P&P reserves that GRZ has at Brisas.
Besides EPM.U have used $375 and $400 gold and $1 copper in their projections. GRZ's pre-feasibility was still only using $350 gold and 90 cent copper. Higher prices make a huge difference to the numbers in these low grade deposits as you are well aware.

Both projects depend on a robust copper price and EPM.U have 50% more shares issued than GRZ have already fully diluted. As Venezuela's currency is still one of the few that is devaluing against the USD it is making GRZ's local costs even cheaper.

Don't get me wrong, I think EPM.U is one of the few reasonably valued gold projects without too many adverse issues. The MC is still to low for many of the funds to get involved but hopefully that should change as the price improves.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext