Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (151791)	11/17/2004 12:14:41 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I have a lot of problems with the proposal, not the least of which is the colossal negative repercussions of using a retaliatory nuke on "harboring" countries where the proof of complicity would be difficult indeed to establish. What if a mistake is made? We've been alerted by now to the deficiencies in our intelligence gathering. I surely think it would be unwise for us to rely for proof that country XYZ helped in making a nuclear attack on us on the same bunch that gave us Iraqi WMD intelligence.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next