What you feel I "seemed" to be claiming is fine, though not what I made a point to say.
Re: "What exactly do you call the unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country which was no in any way threatening the US, with assertions of imminent threat that were not only denied at the time but also found to be baseless later on? What do you call the act of taking the lives of thousands of Iraqi civilians, if not "murder"?"
That sounds a lot like murder to me. However, I don't recall any such scenario playing out in recent memory. If Iraq was "in no way threatening the US," I'll eat my hat. VBG. Remember too will you, as I'm sure you do so well, that on the day we went moved in Iraq, John Kerry stated that it was the right decision(perhaps at the right time too, given the timing of his statement). There were reasons for Kerry's statement which still exist. Would you like to claim Bush is the clown AND the liar behind a lie which convinced Kerry, Clinton, Albright...the USSR...on and on that list goes...if so how silly of you, IMO. Where's the evidence Bush is any different from all the others who believe(d) as he does? I've heard none.
Dan B. |
