SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (57159)11/18/2004 5:07:19 AM
From: manalagiRead Replies (3) of 81568
 
So babies are not innocent and deserve to be killed? Over 100,000 Iraqis have died, how many of them are innocent and how many are innocent?

Letting brave American troops get killed due to unnecessary war is not an innocent act. These soldiers are innocent but were sent to face bullets and bombs of the insurgents.

Don't the neocons have any conscience or soul?

What if we are invaded by another country, cities destroyed, our people who fight foreign occupation got killed. Babies, women and children killed by the occupying forces. The entire city was attacked, 200,000+ citizens had to leave the city and the remainder is considered fair game. If you defend your own home and family and attack the occupier, are you considered a not innocent and deserve to die?

Afterall, don't we have WMD? Don't we have mad neocons controlling the government? Don't we have corruption? Don't we have the capability to attack another country? Aren't we a threat to Iran, Syria, North Korea and any country that does not subscribe to the neocon's philosophy? So, if a foreign country attacks us with the above reasoning, is that justified?

Shouldn't we always consider, what if we are the recipient of our action. Would we like it?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext