Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (87185)	11/19/2004 10:20:29 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 793964

Common Sense From An Uncommon Source By Captain Ed on Current Affairs In a surprising development, the Illinois Supreme Court has smacked down an attempt to use the tort system to put gun manufacturers out of business. In an unanimous ruling, the seven justices told lawyers that gun manufacturers have no responsibility for the crime committed by others with their products: The Illinois Supreme Court threw out two lawsuits accusing gunmakers of knowingly letting weapons fall into the hands of gang members and other criminals, in a ruling Thursday that the manufacturers cannot legally be blamed for street violence. ... "The mere fact that defendants' conduct in their plants, offices and stores puts guns into the stream of commerce does not state a claim for public nuisance," the court said. "It is the presence and use of the guns within the city of Chicago that constitutes the alleged nuisance." The city sought $433 million, the amount it claims it paid in law enforcement and emergency medical treatment for gun violence over four years. The families were seeking unspecified damages. The court heard two appeals on the same subject and ruled in favor of common sense unanimously in both. In another sign that some courts understand the Constitutional separation of powers, five of the seven justices wrote an opinion urging the state legislature to regulate gun sales and ownership more carefully. While I disagree with the thrust of their argument, the fact that they passed up the opportunity to simply legislate their wishes from the bench and deferred to the legislature instead demonstrates an understanding of the proper role of the judiciary. Since this is a state court, the precedent this sets is probably limited in scope. However, the trial lawyers who look to get rich off of weapons manufacturers the same as they did from the tobacco industry will surely appeal this decision to the federal courts. Perhaps common sense will also prevail in that venue.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next