SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East?
SPY 681.43+1.6%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (8046)11/20/2004 8:28:34 AM
From: lorne  Read Replies (2) of 32591
 
Dennis. You said....." In some honesty though, I think it would have been far better to have left Saddam in power as a foil against the Iranians, ".....

Dennis, I have a question....If you or anyone for that matter believes that the time had come to confront radical islam where or what country should the USA have attacked. There are many islam controlled countries who's leaders hate the USA and who are likely actively plotting against the USA. So if one believes as I do that radical islam MUST be confronted and stopped then iraq was the logical place to start.

You said...." I personally view Iran as far more dangerous in terms of nuclear weapons than North Korea".....

I would agree with you that Iran is more dangerous than North Korea but should the USA have attacked Iran instead of Iraq?

IMO the free world is in a war against an ideology and custom....islam.....Clarification...( not all muslims are terrorists ). The enemy is not located in any one country but are scattered world wide so just how can the message be delivered to the world of islam...where or how should the start be.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext