My compliments to Ravenseye for his balanced comments about the pro and con of debate.
Good debate is based on the exchange of hard and soft facts and the open airing of perceived contexts surrounding those facts.
I was playing the role I did in earlier posts to achieve an objective, which I did. Bluntly, it was amazingly easy to get what I wanted. For those of you who insulted me and called me names, I not only wasn't surprised at how vicious the attacks were, but how easy it was to draw them, especially while Anthony is in a trial for his life.
The selection list of who was "banned" two days ago was quite helpful. My thanks to whoever was responsible for this stunt, as you will be found, and I don't think being a lawyer will offer you any protection, if you are one.
To whoever banned the anti-Elgindy posters that had objections to Elgindy's methods, you would have been better advised to debate the points with those parties you saw posting on the site, than face what is coming at you now.
Irrespective of the outcome of the trial, Elgindy is meat before God, whether or not the Government makes the case against him, which I hope they do. So are those he will subsequently roll on. It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people.
Thanks again for all the names and links, and rest assured I have gotten them into the right hands. Thanks also to those who tried to put up objective pieces fairly airing the opposing facts to the view that Elgindy was some sort of Islamic second coming. You really have absolutely nothing to worry about.
Some of you never learned the old lesson "Don't get mad, get even." I threw some red meat chum into the water, and the dumb ones went for it like sharks in a feeding frenzy. You will get to see how the Government does that role.
The book, the Movie. A lot of money is going to be made by the interested parties here.
I'd like to have the paper concession for all the indictments coming down, if history is any guide.
MR> |
