Well, okay: party of six gets killed, including a wife and child, yielding a kindly response of "Live by the gun, die by the gun . . . at least there are some animals now who are not going to be murdered by those five."
You ask if tonight's activity is an appropriate measure of calling a spade a spade? Given the opening dialogue, I'm not entirely certain that Grainne wouldn't go into the woods herself to bag some family in a duck blind to save a couple mallards. Just want to make sure we're all on the same page that it'd be the wrong thing to do. Well, maybe wrong unless it's an herbivore doing the shooting. But then, wait ---- that'd be sport killing, wouldn't it?
"Do you think tonight's action was in proportion to that statement? Do you think tonight's behavior in TOTAL, all of it, not just one person, whose position you might not agree with, but all of it, as appropriate, was adult, was responsible?" |