Pluvia vs. Westergaard Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Andrew Hunter who wrote (550)	8/29/1997 11:40:00 AM
From: Elvis Jones	of 1267

This point must be made. This debate is not only about free speech. It is also about freedoms of companies and investors that are protected by laws in our country. Without agencies like the SEC, any broker can call you, blantantly lie about a company pro/con, and claim he his free to speak however they feel. Pluvia has had a hidden agenda on why he blasted PLSIA (and other "non-dental" stocks). Does his agenda voilate SEC laws? Alan Abelson has a clear agenda (to sell newspapers). And Barron's harsh analysis is one reason I subscribe. Also, I'm sure Alan and Kate Welling stand openly to their critics.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next