Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (152734)	11/27/2004 10:11:37 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 281500

"You will also recall that the US was pressing to include - but was denied - a clause that would automatically escalate the situation to conflict. " IZZAT so? Perhaps you can point me to a credible link discussing that. Then you might want to include an obfuscation or two that allows you to ignore the absolute corruption at the UN & by member nations of the UN Security Council. You may want to squirm a while about how the Oil-for-Food scandal allowed Saddam to bribe his way into protection from UN Sanctions. You might want to BS your way around the lucrative contracts he gave for additional protection from the UN & the US. And you may want to completely ignore all the illegal arms purchases he made that garnered outrageous profits for certain UN countries with veto powers on the UN Security Council too. But hey! All of your obfuscations, distortions, misrepresentations, half truths & outright lies allow you to pretend you still have the high moral ground as you pass off discredited lies about God & Bush, ET AL.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next