SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Watkins who wrote (152746)11/27/2004 11:13:40 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I see you ignored the rest of my reply that just might
explain why they were against any use of force or enforcement
of UN Resolutions. It would stop the gravy train of illegal
bribes, illegal arms sales to Saddam & the lucrative
contracts, all dolled out for protection so Saddam could stay
in power, keep his ties to terrorist groups & resume his WMD
programs the minute sanctions were removed.

But hey! You can cling to your false belief that the
thoroughly corrupt UN, France, Russia, China & Germany were
somehow right that Saddam should have been left in power.

But then you also have to discredit the Iraq Survey Group
that proved Saddam was a genuine threat & he continued to be
egregiously in violation of UN Resolutions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News