SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East?
SPY 681.43+1.6%Nov 10 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (8143)11/27/2004 11:27:01 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (3) of 32591
 
Dennis,

The cost in Iraq needs to be weighed against the costs of the most likely result of the continuation of pre 2002 policies vis-a-via Iraq: eroding sanctions leading to the end of sanctions altogether, perhaps legally, perhaps for all intents and purposes. Then Saddam would have had his oil revenues and been free to go shopping. Consider the willing selliers: AQ Khan and Kim Jong Il. And of course Saddam would have been a willing buyer. Of course Saddam would have been triumphant, and the rest of the Gulf would have reacted accordingly.

Can you just dismiss the idea, knowing what we now know? Was that a positive future we were looking forward to?

The costs of action must always be weighed against the costs of inaction.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext