<Would you say logic is eternal?>
Well, just going by the words, I suppose so [since I've already said that time is a subset of logic and merely an expression of relative distance using other words, so I'd better stick with that or be illogical - that might be called a circular line of logic, so I'd better try for something more].
Yes, I think [having thought for some relative distance = various distances through my brain, commonly called having thought about it for a minute], logic is eternal.
Whatever happens after "now" is a function of what went before. No matter what the relative position of everything is, they're going to move to somewhere else as a consequence of where they were previously in relation to other things.
Logic is eternal. This and that are here and there, therefore, next thing we know, they will have moved to over there, and there. Nothing else could be.
You poke my brain. It fires around along set pathways and comes up with the logical answer. Like a domino theory. Each domino led logically to the other, according to the previously established positions. Now, your dominoes rattle around and follow their logical pathways.
Mqurice |
