Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (18775)	12/1/2004 2:18:56 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) of 28931

"The constitution is based on Theistic philosophical principals that were taken to be "self evident"." It was admitted in the Treaty of Tripoli that The US was not founded as a Christian Nation. And certainly, the fact that it is a secular document confirms the obvious. But if we are to entertain your wild assertion that it is based on polytheistic principles, then one wonders just what in the Hell you are talking about? There are as many theistic beliefs as there are Gods. Is tearing the heart out of a young girl and sacrificing her to the Sun God not a theistic principle? "Men have rights and governments have responsibilities to promote justice." Men have the rights that men give to men. It has always been thus. Theism is a Jewish belief, a Muslim belief, a Christian belief, the beliefs of African tribes, of Native Americans, of Hindus, and thousands of others. Do all of these have the same moral principles and show the world how to live out ethical theistic principles? What nonsense! It took thousands of years for men to decide that rights were for the many...rather than the few. It took thousands of years to develop the moral ideas that Governments were responsible to the people. Theistic principles! BAH! "I am trying to speak to the underlying philosophical basis of the two revolutions and you don't want to go there" I have never left there. The Constitution was about We The People. It was about raising the secular above the religious State and about introducing the new secular ideas of human rights and democratic input. It was about escaping the gouging thumbs and the random swords of the Kings and Priests. It was political and religious "principles" that forced the colonies to either reject the old principles of Church and King as virtual slaves...or to fight for the secular ideas of freedom from tyranny and religion. They chose to risk their lives to get FREE of "theistic principles" as you call the principles through the theistic centuries of no religious freedom, no human rights--and no preference of Government for any modern and rational sense of justice.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next