SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Poet who wrote (90220)12/1/2004 11:55:04 AM
From: E  Read Replies (3) of 108807
 
Po, I've searched for that post about troops (I missed that exchange), and failed to find it, but what would it have to do with whether grainne has banned people for disagreeing with her?

Yesterday I tried getting someone to show evidence that grainne bans people for disagreeing with her. No one had any to show. Since I"m not reading many posts, I have to assume that if no else has any evidence of it, it isn't true.

(As you know, I don't 'get' at all how grainne is responsible for greystone's recent situation.)

If you have any evidence that grainne has banned people for disagreeing with her, as opposed to for name-calling, which she has made a violation of thread rules, you need to post it, imo. (Or acknowledge that your interpretation of what occurred was wrong.) For example, you (or anyone) could post an opinion unaccompanied by nasty name calling that resulted in banning.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News