SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond Duray who wrote (9120)12/3/2004 5:54:46 AM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
Ray > This would be consistent with the sort of steel components that went into the structure.

I'm sure that's true.

> I don't have a good scientific explanation for the pulverization that occurred on 9/11 in those three buildings

WTC7 appeared to come down in the "standard" way ie its "box-like" structure appeared intact while it fell, indicating that most explosive charges must have been in the base of the building. WTC1 and 2 came down in a completely different way where the pictures show enormous explosions taking place in the structure itself.

> This pulverization cannot be explained by mere gravitational forces

That's why I say it's another "smoking gun". The only force I can think of which can cause it is that from an explosive -- and a big one, at that.

> Sadly, we've already seen what happened when an Underwriter's Laboratory manager attempted to alert a NIST manager that there is something rotten in the state of Denmark

We know that -- and that's why we spend our time bleating at chat groups like this one! As if we could do anything about it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext