Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ManyMoose who wrote (90468)	12/3/2004 10:15:07 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) of 108807

I'll have to disagree. Since there were no weapons of mass destruction, since there was no real threat to the US (at least from Iraq), since Al Qaeda was not in league with Saddam, there was no real reason for the war. The regime change of another nation is not within the purview of the US. That is why we had to say there was a threat (because nations are supposed to go to war to defend themselves - HA)- even though, of course, that threat was imagined by us (or fabricated for us by our government). No, I don't think going to war for imagined reasons is a good idea. I will never think that. And no matter how this war turns out, the basis for it was wrong, and (imo) violated international law. I agree with Kofi on that one. One nation can't go around disposing of other countries leaders just because it thinks it has noble reasons for doing so.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next