SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (212589)12/3/2004 6:50:06 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) of 1575391
 
Interesting that you think the media is liberal but unbiased, except the media that is not liberal who are all unprofessional hatemongers.

They are the radio and tv equivalents of the Inquirer.


Rather Biased, Jennings and Brokaw represent the TV version of the Inquirer IMO. So you perceive things differently than many.

Science says your commentary is wrong.

What science?


You forget, you keep asking this, and I keep feeding it to you, and you disgustedly respond that the source is not liberal enough for you to read. Get some balance before your right leg falls off from lack of use.

Let me set the record straight........any one who endorses the current president is a social conservative and a fiscal liberal..........the exact opposite of what I am. You endorse Bush and I don't.

The second half of that appears to be a false statement. You supported legalizing perjury. No person could reasonably called a social conservative who supports perjury.

And frankly, you are rather hung up on this issue. I suspect you need to make us wrong so that you will feel more comfortable with your current position.

Actually, Ted, I am only hung up on the issue when communicating with a person who is disingenuous about their political position. When you state that the dozens of sources I have provided are not liberal enough for you, that gets processed as information.

As i have said many times, and should not have to repeat to you, President Bush does not represent my interests ideally. I am much more fiscally conservative than President Bush is. I am also a social conservative. However, of the available choices, Bush was the better man by every unit of measure.

One was a draft dodger, the other a liar, and a liar about his military service, and a liar to the military about his service. No contest there.

One is honest and honorable; the other is a proponent of whatever policy he thinks is polling well this week. No contest.

One admitted he had an out of control drinking problem and did something about it. The other opportunistically married an out of control alcoholic for her money.

One is married to the sweetest, most human, caring wife. One married the richest politically ambitious loathsome widow available. If only Arriana Huffington had known he was available, oops, not rich enough for his ambitions.

The election is over. We have a leader in the Whitehouse. We need to allow him to lead rather than trying to divide the nation.

promise you that history.......if its portrayed honestly in this country by that time....will note these days as dark ones for the US of A.

IMO, the Clinton years will be recorded as dark days, and these will be recorded as days of honor and honesty with integrity restored to the Whitehouse.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext