Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Don Earl who wrote (9135)	12/4/2004 1:16:58 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (2) of 20039

Don > I think I'd much rather use something like the plumes of debris being ejected from the buildings a hundred feet below the collapse progression, or the behavior of the penthouse on WTC 7, than the "metal fragments" in the above photo. I don't know why you want to argue against yourself? Indeed, why consider only one piece of evidence when there are four? Or more. And how do you decide which is the "right" one -- eeny, meeny?! As far as I am concerned, (1) The spray of metal fragments, whether from the aluminum in the outer walls or the central column reinforcing-steel or both, could have arisen only as result of an explosion. I defy anyone to tell just by looking that no steel was present. (2)The plumes of debris, presumably squibs, are additional evidence. (3)The section of reinforcing steel which is buried in the wall of the building opposite (I can't put my finger on it but I'm sure you have seen the picture), is further evidence. (4) The voluminous quantity of dust, which cannot be accounted for unless a source of energy other than gravitation was present, is yet further evidence.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next