SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_urchin who wrote (9151)12/6/2004 1:52:38 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
You might find this picture more helpful than the drawing:

home.comcast.net

I can see where the drawing would suggest the core was one big piece of concrete, but it was more of a web of steel than anything else. What the photo shows quite well is how much floor space was actually taken up by the structure of the building. None of the stick drawings show how beefy the towers really were. From what I understand, all of the steel was chrome moly, which is the same stuff used for roll cages in 300 MPH dragsters.

It's a safe bet the one thing you will never see accounted for in any multi million dollar, government sponsored theory, is why the core failed the way it did, or why not a single stick of it was left standing after the dust settled. I suspect if one were to interview a number of people on the clean up crews, some of the accounts would be rather enlightening. Since most of the evidence was destroyed, the next best thing would be observations by those who hauled it away, or cut it up for scrap. I'd sure be curious to hear what those 4 inch thick columns looked like on the ends.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext